|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Sydney (AFP) Aug 19, 2015 Australia plans to change the law to stop environmental groups from launching "endless legal sabotage" against developments, Prime Minister Tony Abbott said Wednesday after a court this month blocked a massive India-backed mine. The legal move, which must pass through parliament, comes after a court revoked approval for the Aus$16.5 billion (US$12.1 billion) Adani-backed Carmichael coal mine in Queensland, which has the potential to be one of the world's biggest. Abbott said all projects needed to pass strict environmental standards, but once this had been done and had been approved, they needed to proceed to generate jobs and economic growth. "They shouldn't be subject to endless legal sabotage because the law gives green groups an unusual level of access to the courts," Abbott said. Environmental groups accused the government of attempting to "gut" the Environment Protection, Biodiversity and Conservation (EPBC) Act by changing provisions that allow Australians to question federal approvals in court. "The... EPBC Act has lasted 16 years without bringing the economy to a shuddering halt," said Glen Klatovsky from a coalition of environment groups including Greenpeace, the Wilderness Society and WWF-Australia. Klatovsky said the current system provided a safeguard against biased decision-making and better accountability. "We are concerned that this massive over-reach is a desperate attempt to divert public attention away from questions of government competence," he added. The Federal Court decision against the Carmichael mine, which requires the government to reconsider its approval on new advice, was brought by a small environmental group. It had challenged the approval of the open-cut and underground coal mine on the basis of the amount of greenhouse gases it would create, its impact on vulnerable species and Adani's "poor environmental record". Activists have also argued the controversial project could impact the Great Barrier Reef, one of the world's most biodiverse marine areas, because the coal would have to be shipped out of a nearby port. The government has accused green activists of a deliberate campaign to damage coal mining in Australia, a key export commodity and driver for the economy. The changes are expected to remove a provision allowing environmental organisations to initiate legal challenges, although the government said locals directly affected by projects could still question the approvals process. "We're just saying if people live 600 kilometres, 1,600 kilometres away from a coal mine or from a development proposal, what right to do they have to prevent that proposal from providing an economic boost to the region," Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Tuesday. "The alarming thing about the case of Adani is it's showing that the environmentalists are taking this war against economic development in Australia to a whole new level." mfc/mp/jah
Related Links Global Trade News
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |