. | . |
Chinese human rights lawyers set their sights on smog By Becky Davis Beijing (AFP) Jan 22, 2017 Toxic smog has found itself in the dock in China, as the authorities are taken to court over a problem that has choked entire regions, put public health at risk and forced the closure of schools and roads. At the helm is a group of human rights lawyers, who despite increasing government hostility to their work on some of China's most sensitive cases, say popular feeling is behind them when it comes to pollution that is literally off the charts. "Chinese people aren't too concerned about societal problems and things that aren't happening to them personally, but this issue is different: everyone is a victim and is personally influenced by breathing polluted air," lawyer Yu Wensheng told AFP. He is among a group of six lawyers who began filing their suits in December after a choking cloud of haze descended on China's northeast, affecting some 460 million people. The campaign comes amid growing public anger over China's bad air, which has fuelled protests and spurred emigration among the wealthy. Yu, who has defended prominent civil rights lawyers targeted by the government and people detained for supporting Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement, said the importance and impact of the pollution suit "far exceeds" his previous human rights cases. Even acquaintances opposed to Yu's politics and police at a client's detention centre had expressed support, he said, noting it was "very unusual". - 'Mostly symbolic' - However, there are concerns authorities might be trying to muzzle online discussion on the issue and quell discontent by suppressing information on air quality. In December, a week of thick haze forced cities across the northeast to go on "red alert" for nearly a week, closing schools, factories and construction sites and taking around half of vehicles off the roads. As visibility dropped and airports cancelled hundreds of flights, people took to social media to vent their rage against a government that had long promised to solve the problem. But comments about the heavy smog quickly began disappearing from the web. On Wednesday, the Meteorological Administration also ordered local weather bureaus to stop issuing smog alerts, which authorities said was intended to improve coordination. A document submitted by Yu's associate to the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court accused the government of "severe dereliction of duty" in pollution management and sacrificing human health in pursuit of "toxic GDP growth" by turning a blind eye to the excessive emissions of local companies. The lawyers have little hope of winning or even successfully filing their cases and are viewing the suits as "mostly symbolic", Yu said. The document asked for authorities to publish an apology online and in the local state-run newspaper for a week, and hand over compensation of 65 yuan ($9.50) for the price of his smog mask and 9,999 yuan for emotional damages. He hopes the suits will help keep the issue in the public eye, adding he wants to inspire others to file complaints. "Our main goal is to raise people's awareness of pollution and wake them up to how the government should bear responsibility for its inaction and ineffectual response," he said. Notably, China can clear the skies for important occasions such as the 2014 APEC summit or the 2008 Olympics, but does so selectively due to the high economic cost. "They can do it, but they do not," Yu said. - 'Smog victims ourselves' - Another lawyer Ma Wei, who is suing the city of Tianjin, said he has received no official response even weeks after the court was legally required to issue one. Instead, the public security bureau and other authorities have tried to pressure him to retract his suit. "I refused and told them, 'I'm doing this so that you can breathe clean air, too,'" he said. The lawyers are used to harassment. Since President Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, the country has cracked down on civil rights defenders. Though the government initially targeted political activists and human rights campaigners, it has increasingly turned its attention to the legal professionals who represent them. In 2014, authorities imprisoned and tortured Yu for 99 days for allegedly "disturbing public order". Still, he is not afraid. "We are lawyers," he said, "but also first and foremost citizens and smog victims ourselves." "If we do things according to the law and still get detained," he added, "it will be just the thing to show people the true nature of our so-called 'rule of law'."
Related Links Our Polluted World and Cleaning It Up
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |