. | . |
Google defies China, risks banishment over cyber attacks San Francisco (AFP) Jan 13, 2010 Google has vowed to defy Chinese Internet censors and risk banishment from the lucrative market in outrage at "highly sophisticated" cyber attacks aimed at Chinese human rights activists. China-based cyber spies struck the Internet giant and at least 20 other unidentified firms in an apparent bid to hack into the email accounts of activists around the world, Google said Tuesday. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on Beijing to explain the cyber attacks. "We look to the Chinese government for an explanation," the chief US diplomat said in a released statement. "The ability to operate with confidence in cyberspace is critical in a modern society and economy." The online espionage has Google reconsidering its business operations in China and it said it will no longer filter Internet search engine results in that country. "These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered -- combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the Web -- have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China," Google chief legal officer David Drummond said in a blog post. "We are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all," he said. Drummond said Google realizes that defying Chinese government demands regarding filtering Internet search engine results may mean having to shut down its operations in China. Human rights activists hailed Google, voicing hope it would lead Western companies to reconsider their compromises in doing business in China. "Through international pressure, finally a big business in the West has come to realize its own conscience," prominent Chinese dissident Wei Jingsheng, who spent 18 years in prison before entering exile in the United States, told AFP. T. Kumar, the Washington-based advocacy director of Amnesty International, urged other Internet companies to follow Google's lead. "We're glad that at last international Internet companies are waking up to the reality that they cannot go along with oppressive nations like China," Kumar said. The iconic "Tank Man" photo taken during the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown and banned in China was available on Google.cn Wednesday. The picture of a Chinese man who boldly stood in front of a line of tanks during the crackdown on pro-democracy protests made headlines around the world. It is banned in China where the event is still hugely sensitive. Google said it detected in mid-December "a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google." The company said it was notifying at least 20 other large companies of similar attacks including finance, Internet, media, technology and chemical firms. "We have no indication that any of our mail properties have been compromised," Microsoft told AFP, declining to comment further. Yahoo! backed Google's decision. "We stand aligned with Google that these kinds of attacks are deeply disturbing and strongly believe that the violation of user privacy is something that we as Internet pioneers must all oppose," Yahoo! said in response to an AFP inquiry. Google said its investigation revealed that accounts of China human rights activists who use Gmail in Europe, China or the United States have been "routinely accessed" using malware sneaked onto their computers. Google believes the attack was mostly blocked and that only minor information was stolen from two accounts. "The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences," said Drummond, adding that the heart of the matter is freedom of speech on the global Internet. Google stressed that the decision was made by the California company's US-based executives and not by workers within easy reach of authorities in China. "Google was in a no-win situation," Silicon Valley analyst Rob Enderle told AFP. "The choices they've got are all bad, but this one allows them to claim the high ground at home by standing up to evil China." Internet firms interested in access to China's booming market have been pressured to acquiesce to "onerous" government rules regarding online censorship, according to Enderle. "China is a hard market to walk away from," he said. "It took a lot of guts. Capitulating wasn't working, so taking a harder stance might work better." Google's unofficial motto "Don't Be Evil" became a topic of derision after the company in 2006 began censoring search results in China. "When Google first launched a filtered search engine in China, EFF was one of the first to criticize it," Danny O'Brien of the Electronic Freedom Foundation said in a blog post. "We'd now like to be one of the first to commend Google for its brave and forthright declaration to restore an uncensored Chinese language version of its search engine."
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Global Trade News
Baidu shares surge as Google threatens to quit China Shanghai (AFP) Jan 13, 2010 Shares in China's top search engine Baidu surged in after-hours trading Wednesday after Google vowed to defy China's Internet censors and threatened to pull out of the country. The Nasdaq-listed Baidu surged to 413.52 dollars per share in after-hours trade at 0100 GMT, up 6.99 percent from Tuesday's market close of 386.49 dollars in New York. The Chinese company declined to comment on Go ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |