 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
Group Selection, A Theory Whose Time Has Come...Again
Washington DC (SPX) Nov 29, 2007 "Although a high standard of morality gives but a slight or no advantage to each individual man and his children over the other men of the same tribe...an advancement in the standard of morality will certainly give an immense advantage to one tribe over another." With these words, Charles Darwin proposed an evolutionary explanation for morality and pro-social behaviors- individuals behaving for the good of their group, often at their own expense-that anticipated the future discipline of Sociobiology. A century after this famous passage was published in The Descent of Man (1871), however, Darwin's explanation based on group selection had become taboo and has not recovered since. In a landmark article for The Quarterly Review of Biology, "Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology," eminent evolutionary scientists David Sloan Wilson and Edward O. Wilson-whose book Sociobiology:The New Synthesis brought widespread attention to the field in 1975-call for an end to forty years of confusion and divergent theories. They propose a new consensus and theoretical foundation that affirms Darwin's original conjecture and is supported by the latest biological findings. Wilson and Wilson trace much of the confusion in the field to the 1960's, when most evolutionists rejected "for the good of the group" thinking and insisted that all adaptations must be explained in terms of individual self-interest. In an even more reductionistic move, genes were called "the fundamental unit of selection," as if this was an argument against group selection. Scientific dogma became entrenched in popular culture with the publication of Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene (1976). Although evidence in favor of group selection began accumulating almost immediately after its rejection, its taboo status prevented a systematic re-evaluation of the field until now. Based on current theory and evidence, Wilson and Wilson show that natural selection is unequivocally a multilevel process, as Darwin originally envisioned, and that adaptations can evolve at all levels of the biological hierarchy, from genes to ecosystems. They conclude with a rallying cry that paraphrases Rabbi Hillel: "Selfishness beats altruism within groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups. Everything else is commentary," Wilson and Wilson free sociobiology to once again pursue all lines of inquiry within its discipline. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Darwin Today At TerraDaily.com
Weed Science Predators Consume Weed Species From Surface And Buried Seeds
Washington DC (SPX) Nov 28, 2007Results of a new study suggest that predators of weed seeds by both vertebrates and invertebrates may reduce weed emergence and influence the weed community. The study is published in the latest issue of Weed Science. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
