. | . |
Outside View: Obama courting disaster
College Park, Md. (UPI) Mar 26, 2009 President Obama's strategy to combat the recession courts disaster. He proposes huge federal deficits from 2009 to 2011 to prop up domestic demand and break the negative feedback cycle of rising unemployment, falling incomes and sinking consumer spending while recapitalizing the banks to get credit flowing again. This would require nearly $4 trillion in federal borrowing. Such deficits are unsustainable in the long term; however, the president promises to borrow less in 2012, when he believes the economy will grow robustly again. Simply, these policies do not address the root causes of the recession and will likely put the economy back in the sink. The meltdown was caused by three great forces -- Chinese mercantilism, dysfunctional U.S. energy policies and Wall Street abuses. Beginning in 1994, China artificially undervalued its currency by printing yuan to buy dollars. Coupled with export subsidies, this flooded U.S. store shelves with inexpensive Chinese goods and created a huge trade imbalance between China and the United States. Concurrently, the U.S. energy policy encouraged Detroit to sell ever bigger gas-guzzlers and limited domestic oil and gas development in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere. The cost of oil imports rocketed to fuel 4,000-pound SUVs that transported 110-pound soccer moms. The trade deficit jumped from $65 billion in 1993 to an average of more than $700 billion annually from 2005 to 2008, or about 5 percent of the gross domestic product. Today, imports from the Middle Kingdom and petroleum account for nearly the entire U.S. trade deficit. Simply, money spent on imported coffeemakers and oil can't be spent on U.S.-made goods and services. To sustain adequate demand for what Americans make, Americans must spend and consume 5 percent more than they earn or produce. Until the credit bubble burst and banks collapsed, the Chinese and Middle East investors bankrolled it all, and Wall Street's financiers happily brokered a false prosperity. Chinese and Middle East exporters used the dollar proceeds from their large trade surpluses to buy U.S. bonds and property. That kept long-term interest rates low, permitted Americans to borrow recklessly on homes and commercial buildings, and juiced property and stock prices. Borrowing to sustain this paper prosperity grew much more rapidly than the incomes of Americans to support bigger mortgages and rising rents on retail space. Bankers responded by writing ever more creative loans -- mortgages without down payments and some loans designed to be refinanced every few years against rising property values. Bankers found ways to lend more against investor paid-in capital, which provides their cushion against bad loans during a recession. They wrote credit default swaps -- insurance policies against loan defaults -- that were backed by few, if any, assets. Financial houses exchanged swaps in a grand Ponzi scheme that may take a decade to unwind. Thirsting for million-dollar bonuses, Wall Street bankers abandoned sound risk management for Las Vegas finance. When the house of cards collapsed, credit dried up and consumer spending tanked, unemployment rocketed, and President Obama inherited the biggest mess since the Great Depression. President Obama's stimulus package will temporarily reflate demand for goods and services by replacing private borrowing from China and Middle East royals with government borrowing. However, as the economy recovers in 2010 and 2011, U.S. imports of Chinese goods and Middle East oil will expand significantly. When federal stimulus spending subsides in 2012, either foreign lenders and banks will finance another round of reckless U.S. consumer borrowing, or the demand for U.S.-made products will fall and the economy will sink back into recession. President Obama's economic brew avoids addressing Chinese protectionism. His energy policies mostly focus on domestic coal and natural gas use but generally leave efficiency standards for cars alone. And Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's plans to recapitalize banks by purchasing toxic mortgages and securities dodges reforming the compensation and management practices that created so much reckless lending and trashed the balance sheets of the world's largest financial institutions. China and other nations are growing weary of holding so many dollars and bonds as the ability of the United States to service its debts is cast into doubt. Instead of another credit bubble in 2012 followed by another burst a few years later, we are likely to see yet another flop in demand and an even deeper recession. Unless Obama quickly addresses the trade deficits with China and on oil, along with the poor management of U.S. banks, then the next decade will become hauntingly remindful of one that began in 1929. (Peter Morici is a professor at the University of Maryland's Smith School of Business and a former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.) (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.) Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links The Economy
China central bank chief says economy turning around Beijing (AFP) March 26, 2009 The head of China's central bank said Thursday data showed that a slowdown in economic growth has hit bottom and a national recovery was imminent thanks to government stimulus measures. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |