. | . |
UK govt accused of prioritising China ties over steel jobs By Katherine HADDON London (AFP) April 1, 2016
Is a new special relationship threatening an old staple of British industry? Prime Minister David Cameron's government faced damaging claims Friday that its push for closer ties with China is holding back efforts to save 15,000 steel jobs. The row has spiralled since Wednesday, when India's Tata Steel said it was selling its UK assets. This threatens the Port Talbot steel works, Wales's biggest single employer located in an area already hit hard by the decline of heavy industry. A glut of cheap Chinese imports is a major reason why world steel prices have plunged in recent years -- and why Port Talbot is now reportedly losing some �1 million (1.3 million euros, $1.4 million) a day. Cameron's government faces accusations that it has blocked higher EU tariffs on Chinese steel as anger grows that an iconic British industry dating back to the 19th century that once provided 40 percent of the world's supply is now at risk. Charles de Lusigan, a spokesman for the European Steel Association which represents European steelmakers, said Britain had opposed a European Union plan to bolster defences against cheap Chinese imports. "They thought that if they blocked the changing and the modernisation of the trade defence instruments, that would give them favours with China," he told AFP. The body's head, Axel Eggert, told Friday's Financial Times that Britain was "the ringleader in a blocking minority of member states" over the EU plan to ignore a key regulation when setting anti-dumping tariffs. EU import tariffs on Chinese steel products are low, particularly compared to the United States. The EU duty on Chinese cold-rolled steel currently stands at 16 percent, compared to 236 percent in the US. Nick Clegg, Cameron's deputy prime minister in a coalition government until last year, said finance minister George Osborne, architect of closer relations with China and Cameron's right hand man, had "put his special relationship with China above the UK's best interests." - 'Faustian pact' with China? - Britain rolled out the red carpet for President Xi Jinping on a state visit last year which included a banquet hosted by Queen Elizabeth II. This yielded trade deals worth �40 billion, including China taking a one-third stake in the troubled project to build Britain's first nuclear plant in decades at Hinkley Point in southwest England. Osborne says he wants Britain to be China's "best partner in the West" but the alliance has long sounded alarms bells for some, over human rights as well as the economy. "It is hard to pin down the exact moment when George Osborne's love affair with China turned into a Faustian pact," Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the Daily Telegraph's international business editor, wrote Thursday. While ministers have ruled out renationalising the steel industry -- privatised under Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government in 1988 -- they say they will do everything possible to support finding a new buyer. Osborne said Friday that Britain was "leading the way" in Europe in trying to make the steel industry competitive. "Both at home, where we are cutting taxes on energy and internationally, where we are working with others to make sure there are tariffs on unfairly cheap steel, you have got a government doing everything it can to help the steel industry," he told the BBC. Business Secretary Sajid Javid was visiting Port Talbot Friday to try and reassure workers after returning early from a trip to Australia. But trade unions representing the workers also say they are not impressed by the government's approach. "So far all they have received is tea and sympathy from afar with no real concrete solutions for the industrial crisis facing the nation," said Andy Richards, Welsh secretary of Unite, Britain's biggest trade union.
EU steelmakers say UK helped cheap China imports The decision by Indian giant Tata to put its business at the Port Talbot steel plant in south Wales up for sale has forced Prime Minister David Cameron to hold crisis talks at the prospect of losing up to 15,000 jobs. "Britain opposed the end of the lesser duty rule," Charles de Lusignan, a spokesman for Brussels-based Eurofer, told AFP, referring to an EU plan to ignore a key regulation when setting anti-dumping tariffs. "They thought that if they blocked the changing and the modernisation of the trade defence instruments, that would give them favours with China," he added. Eurofer boss Axel Eggert, whose organisation represents Europe's steelmakers, was quoted as telling the Financial Times on Friday that London "is the ringleader in a blocking minority of member states that is preventing a European Commission proposal on the modernisation of Europe's trade defence instruments." Britain in February signed a statement with six other European Union states urging Brussels to take action against "dumping" of steel at low prices. But Eurofer said that statements by British business minister Sajid Javid showed that London was in fact opposed to getting rid of the lesser duty rule. "Britain is generally seen as being in favour of market economy status for China, and they are seeking investment from the Chinese," said de Lusignan, referring to a designation that would lift bans on certain Chinese exports and investments. "As most dumping cases involve Chinese cases, that makes a direct link between changes to the anti-dumping system and relations with China." Compared to the United States, EU import tariffs on Chinese steel imports are low -- there is duty of 16 percent on Chinese cold-rolled steel compared to a 236 percent tariff in the US. Cameron is now battling to avoid the Tata situation giving fuel to campaigners who want Britain to leave the European Union in a tight referendum on June 23. Fitch Ratings on March 24 said that the European Commission's proposal to ditch the lesser duty rule "could materially reduce Chinese steel exports to the region".
Related Links Global Trade News
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |