. | . |
US warns China against 'stillborn' climate deal
Washington (AFP) Feb 9, 2010 The United States on Tuesday pressed China, India and other emerging powers to make clearer commitments to fighting climate change, warning that last year's Copenhagen accord risked being "stillborn." The 194-nation UN-led summit in the Danish capital pledged to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) along with billions of dollars in financing. It gave countries until January 31 to sign on. China, India, Brazil and South Africa each submitted to the United Nations their plans to fight climate change but described them as voluntary and did not formally endorse the Copenhagen deal. Todd Stern, the US special envoy on climate change, described the positions of the four developing powers as "a bit ambiguous." "I do believe that they will sign on to the accord because the consequences of not doing so are so serious -- in a word, leaving the accord stillborn, contrary to the clear assent their leaders gave to the accord in Copenhagen," Stern said at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think-tank. The Copenhagen summit in December worked on a framework for fighting climate change after 2012, when developed nations' commitments to curb carbon emissions blamed for global warming run out under the landmark Kyoto Protocol. Stern refused to predict whether a full-fledged successor to Kyoto would be ready in time for the next major meeting in December in Cancun, Mexico. "I hope that we can get to a full legal treaty in December, but I'm not going to make any predictions one way or the other," he said. "I'm also not going to fall into the trap of saying if it's not that, we've got a failure." Developing nations insist that wealthy nations are historically responsible for climate change and therefore should be the only ones with legal obligations. Stern said the United States was ready to do its part but added: "The imperative of bringing all major emitters into a regime of climate commitments is clear -- there is simply no other way to head off the coming crisis." The United States joined other developed nations in signing on to the Copenhagen accord, a sharp change from the presidency of George W. Bush who rejected Kyoto as unfair. But President Barack Obama's administration is still trying to overcome opposition in the Senate to approving the first US nationwide plan to cut carbon emissions. Obama flew to Copenhagen and negotiated with Chinese and other officials to reach the deal, which he and other world leaders acknowledged did not meet their hopes. Stern, who said the deal was better than talks' collapse, did not mince words about the Copenhagen summit, calling it "a snarling, aggravated, chaotic event -- and that doesn't even go into the food, the lines and all the rest." He accused unspecified "rabble-rousers" of trying to scuttle the conference. Under the rules of the UN Framework Convention of Climate Change, all agreements must have consensus for approval. A handful of developing states -- particularly Sudan, Venezuela and Cuba -- were harshly critical of the Copenhagen accord, with the Sudanese envoy even likening Western nations' policies to the Holocaust.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
Walker's World: Climate facts and doubts Washington (UPI) Feb 8, 2009 With the capital city of the United States immobilized by the kind of snow that Moscow takes in stride, the phrase "global warming" is becoming a bad joke. But "climate change," the preferred alternative of the scientists that allows them to blame hurricanes, floods and blizzards on carbon emissions, is also at increasing risk of mockery. The climate scientists have only themselves to b ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |