Bush Wants Talks To Make North Korea's Kim To See "Common Sense."

NUKEWARS

Yes, acquiring nuclear weapons was largely a decision driven by "common sense".

Washington (AFP) Jul 20, 2005
President George W. Bush Tuesday said he hoped new six-party crisis talks this month would make North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il see "common sense" and abandon his nuclear weapons drive.

Bush discussed latest developments in the dangerous game of nuclear brinksmanship with the isolated Stalinist state in talks with Australian Prime Minister John Howard at the White House.

"I told him that we're committed to solving the North Korean nuclear issue in a diplomatic way and that we're pleased that the six-party talks have become renewed," Bush told reporters.

"We're sincere about working with China and South Korea and Japan and Russia to bring some common sense to the leader of North Korea," said Bush.

The fourth round of so-far inconclusive talks on North Korea's nuclear ambitions will take place in Beijing on July 26, China said Tuesday.

Pyongyang broke off the talks in June 2004, rejecting a US offer then on the table which required an up-front pledge to dismantle all nuclear programs before getting energy and other assistance.

Bush also said he believed that Australia, a key Asian regional power and US ally, could help influence China to pressure Kim to stand down his nuclear program.

"I know that Australia can lend a wise message to the Chinese about the need for China to take an active role in the neighborhood to prevent, for example, Kim Jong-Il from developing a nuclear weapon," Bush said.

North Korea made a surprise announcement earlier this month that it would return to the table for the talks, days before South Korea offered to build new power lines across the border and provide electricity to the North.

South Korea also pledged 500,000 tonnes of rice to the starving and isolated nation.

Last month, Washington said it was donating 50,000 tonnes of food aid to North Korea, but denied it was bait to lure Kim's regime back to the talks.

The six-party talks began in August 2003, nearly a year after Pyongyang allegedly told US officials it was running a uranium enrichment program. It has since claimed it has nuclear bombs.

The United States has made clear it wants to see concrete action next week, with a senior administration official saying it was no longer time to "talk for talk's sake."

However, the official stopped short of saying the upcoming round would be the last attempt before Washington seeks United Nations sanctions against the Stalinist regime, a move opposed by China and South Korea.

Another US official, deputy State Department spokesman Adam Ereli said Tuesday the US believed its proposal could spark progress.

"Our proposal is one set of ideas on the table. We think it's a good set of ideas. We think it addresses the major issues and it should be the basis for serious discussion," Ereli said.

Kim told Chinese presidential envoy Tang Jiaxuan last week he was looking forward to "positive progress."

The United States has refused to hold direct one-on-one talks with Pyongyang, arguing it will not reward North Korea for breaking a 1994 anti-nuclear pact.

All rights reserved. � 2005 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

NUKEWARS

Can N.Korea Let South Control The On-Off Switch?

Seoul (AFP) Jul 14, 2005
South Korea has made a huge offer to supply the North with electricity in exchange for abandoning nuclear weapons, but would the Stalinist state let Seoul control so much of its power?

Thanks for being here; We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain. With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords. Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year. If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor $5 Billed Once credit card or paypal		SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter $5 Billed Monthly paypal only

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.