. | . |
Apple leaves US Chamber of Commerce over climate clash Washington (AFP) Oct 6, 2009 Computing giant Apple has decided to leave the US Chamber of Commerce in protest over the organization's opposition to tough climate change rules, according to a letter published on Tuesday. The firm "supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions, and it is frustrating to find the Chamber at odds with us in this effort," according to Apple vice president Catherine Novelli. "We would prefer the chamber take a more progressive stance on this critical issue and play a constructive role in addressing the climate crisis," said the Apple letter dated October 5, published in US media. "However, because the Chamber's position differs so sharply with Apple's, we have decided to resign our membership effective immediately," it added. Apple is the fourth major US corporation to walk out of the Chamber of Commerce over its stance on climate change. It followed similar moves by Pacific Gas and Electricity, PNM Resources and Exelon. Nike, the sporting goods giant, dropped its responsibilities on the Chamber's board but remains a member. "While we'll continue to represent the broad majority of our membership on this goal, we recognize that there are some companies who stand to gain more than others with the current options on the table," Eric Wohlschlegel, a council spokesman, said in an email. Chamber president Thomas Donohue said in a statement September 29 that his organization backed US government legislation on fighting global warming but not legislation currently going through Congress. "We believe that in order to succeed, any climate change response must include all major CO2 emitting economies, promote new technologies, emphasize efficiency, ensure affordable energy for families and businesses, and help create American jobs and return our economy to prosperity," Donohue said. "The Congress should carefully deliberate on and enact legislation that meets these goals." He argued that the US Congress should set climate change policy through legislation, and not have "the EPA apply existing environmental statutes that were not created to regulate greenhouse gas emissions." "We oppose the Waxman-Markey bill because it is neither comprehensive nor international, and it falls short on moving renewable and alternative technologies into the marketplace and enabling our transition to a lower carbon future. It would also impose carbon tariffs on goods imported into the United States, a move that would almost certainly spur retaliation from global trading partners," Donohue said. The Chamber calls itself the world's largest business federation with three million members. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
UN climate talks: baby steps on the road to Copenhagen Bangkok (AFP) Oct 5, 2009 Long-deadlocked UN climate talks are finally starting to shift from procedure to substance only two months before a critical climate summit in Copenhagen, negotiators and green groups said Monday. "There is definitely a positive dynamic. New York injected a sense of urgency," said Paul Watkinson, head of France's climate negotiation team, referring to the first-ever UN climate leaders' summi ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |