. | . |
Attractive businesswomen considered less trustworthy, surveys suggest by Brooks Hays Washington (UPI) Mar 25, 2019 Like many professional fields, women remain underrepresented in business -- and women that are in business deal with a variety of challenging biases. According to a new study, attractive businesswomen face extra challenges. Previous research efforts have suggested attractive women are perceived as too feminine for traditionally masculine roles, but new surveys showed the biases facing attractive businesswomen are more complex. In the eyes of both men and women, attractive female businesswomen are seen as less trustworthy and less truthful -- a phenomenon researchers dubbed the "femme fatale effect." Surveys also revealed men and women find attractive businesswomen more deserving of being fired than less attractive female colleagues. "Highly attractive women can be perceived as dangerous and that matters when we are assessing things like how much we trust them and whether we believe that what they are saying is truthful," Leah Sheppard, an assistant professor of management at Washington State University, said in a news release. Previous studies have shown attractiveness to offer a variety of benefits. The latest research -- published in the journal Sex Roles -- complicates the notion. "There's two dueling stereotypes here," Sheppard said. "You have the 'what is beautiful is good' stereotype, meaning that in general attractive people should fare better across their lifespan. We can say that that's generally true." "It becomes more nuanced when we look at gender," Sheppard said. "For women there are certain contexts in which they don't seem to benefit from their beauty." The goddess Circe and her sirens -- infamous for seducing Homer's Odysseus and keeping him from his wife for more than a year -- were the original femme fatales. The stereotype has persisted for millennia. Sheppard and Stefanie Johnson, an associate professor of management at the University of Colorado, began their research by selecting "professional women" images using Google search results. The two researchers had participants on Amazon's Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform, rate the attractiveness of each businesswoman. During a series of surveys, Sheppard and Johnson had participants rate the truthfulness of women and men delivering the news of company layoffs. Regardless of their professional background, the most attractive women were deemed less trustworthy. Whether the fictional females bearing bad news were announcing layoffs at a tech startup or a hospital, survey participants found attractive female employees less truthful. In another study, researchers presented participants with similar fictional layoff scenarios, but first, Sheppard and Johnson had participants think about a time when they were in a committed relationship and were confident that their romantic partner entirely faithful. The goal of the exercise was to prime the participants' "sexual security." The primed participants found less attractive and more attractive females equally believable. For the final test, researchers primed some participants to feel sexually secure and others to feel sexually insecure, and then asked them to consider whether or not a female employee deserved to be fired. Sexually primed participants were less likely to call for the firing of the employee regardless of the female's level of attractiveness. Sexually insecure participants were more likely to call for the attractive female to be let go. Sheppard and Johnson suggest evolutionary pressures underly the femme fatale effect. Females may instinctively see attractive females as competition for mates, while men may be concerned an attractive female would be unfaithful. Study authors claim the negative effects of stereotypes can be blunted by speaking more openly about stereotypes and gendered expectations, but research suggests most people prefer to avoid the subject. "They're going to be challenged in terms of building trust," Sheppard said. "That's not to say that they can't do it. It's just that trust is probably going to form a bit more slowly."
Humans can be tricked just like computers Washington (UPI) Mar 22, 2019 Using the same visual tricks that trip up computers, researchers at Johns Hopkins University have managed to get humans to think like CPUs. "Most of the time, research in our field is about getting computers to think like people," Chaz Firestone, an assistant professor of psychological and brain sciences at Johns Hopkins, said in a news release. "Our project does the opposite - we're asking whether people can think like computers." Computers do a few things much better than humans. They ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |