|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Beijing (AFP) June 23, 2014 A state-run Chinese newspaper on Monday slammed Hong Kong's unofficial referendum on democratic reform -- which has drawn more than 700,000 votes -- as an "illegal farce" that was "tinged with mincing ludicrousness". The poll, which opened Friday, comes as tensions grow in the former British colony over the future of its electoral system, with increasingly vocal calls from residents to be able to choose who can run for the post of chief executive. But the Global Times daily, which is linked to China's ruling Communist party, accused the pro-democracy advocates who organised the referendum of being politically influenced by the West. It said "overseas supporters have overestimated the effect of an illegal farce". China's entire population of 1.3 billion people had a right to a say on Hong Kong's future, it added. "Neither China's central government nor the Hong Kong government will admit the results of the poll," it said. "It would be ridiculous to determine the direction of Hong Kong's political reform with this informal referendum." The organisers' use of electronic voting was "tinged with mincing ludicrousness", said the paper, which often takes a nationalist tone, in a typically colourful English editorial. Beijing faces continuing tensions in Buddhist-majority Tibet and mainly Muslim Xinjiang, and the paper offered a possible clue to its wider concerns: "The country would fall into tumult if all regions conducted similar referendums." The Chinese version of the editorial was more vehement, reminding the organisers that "the state defeated the Iron Lady's administration and took back Hong Kong", referring to the negotiation between then-British prime minister Margaret Thatcher and China's then-paramount leader Deng Xiaoping in the early 1980s. "The opposition in Hong Kong should not have the delusion that they could, by organising a street farce, achieve what London at the time was not able to do despite making every effort possible," it said. No reference to the former British administration was included in the article's English version. The paper accused organisers of having a "gambling mentality", saying that Beijing will "never compromise on sovereignty-related issues". "The simplest reason is that the Basic Law reflects the will of the whole nation as well, and therefore more than 1.3 billion people have the right to speak on Hong Kong's political reform," it said, referring to Hong Kong's constitution. Hong Kong's leader is currently appointed by a 1,200-strong pro-Beijing committee. China has promised direct elections for the next chief executive in 2017, but has ruled out allowing voters to choose which candidates can stand. Although the unofficial referendum has no legal standing, activists hope that a high turnout will bolster the case for reform. The poll allows residents to choose between three options on how the 2017 chief executive ballot should be carried out -- each of which would allow voters to choose candidates for the top job, and all therefore considered unacceptable by Beijing. China's State Council, the equivalent of its cabinet, said Friday that any referendum on how Hong Kong elects its leader would be "illegal and invalid". But participation since voting began online Friday has beaten all expectations -- despite a major cyberattack that the organisers have blamed on Beijing. The more than 700,000 who had voted both online and at polling booths as of Monday morning represent a sizeable proportion of the 3.47 million who registered to vote at elections in 2012.
Related Links Democracy in the 21st century at TerraDaily.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |