. | . |
China's corporate loyalty drive ensnares international lawyers By Jerome TAYLOR Hong Kong (AFP) March 26, 2021 China's push to ensure multinationals toe the line has seeped into the legal sphere after Beijing sanctioned a top British law office -- a surprise move that resurrected concerns about the future of Hong Kong's courts. Beijing this week placed tit-for-tat sanctions on individuals and entities from the European Union and Britain who have taken up the cause of China's Uyghur Muslim minority in Xinjiang. And it fired up a social media-driven boycott of Western apparel brands such as H&M, Nike and Adidas that have declined to use cotton grown in the region over widespread reports of rights abuses. But Friday's sanctions targeting Britain opened up a new front in China's campaign for corporate loyalty. Among the entities included on the latest blacklist was Essex Court Chambers, a London-based partnership of senior lawyers or barristers. The announcement sent shockwaves through the legal community in Hong Kong, because those sanctioned are banned from doing business in, or travelling to, the finance hub. "It lit up our phones, even lawyer friends who are not particularly political," a Hong Kong barrister told AFP, requesting anonymity. - Hong Kong's future - The reason the latest sanctions rattled nerves is the unique legal status the city holds -- a position some fear is at risk. Unlike China's party-controlled courts, Hong Kong boasts an internationally respected common law system that forms the bedrock of its business hub reputation. Top lawyers from common law jurisdictions, including Britain, operate in the city or are instructed by companies and individuals there. Last month, four members of Essex Court Chambers published a legal opinion that China's actions in Xinjiang offered a "credible case" of "crimes against humanity and the crime of genocide". In a statement Friday, the chambers in London stressed that the four barristers had taken on the brief at the request of Uyghur rights groups, "providing independent legal advice in accordance with their professional obligations and qualifications". "Essex Court Chambers is not a law firm and has no collective or distinct legal identity of any kind," it said, noting that only the four barristers were involved, not the collective at large. In both Britain and Hong Kong, "chambers" group self-employed barristers who pool their resources for clerical work and office space. Essex boasts some 90 barristers and has a Singapore office. But the sanctions go potentially far wider. Lawrence Collins, a former UK Supreme Court judge who currently sits on Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal, joined the Essex chambers' London offices in 2012 as an arbitrator. Britain is currently reviewing the participation of its judges on the top Hong Kong court, a legacy of the territory's 1997 handover to Chinese rule. Asked by AFP about repercussions from the sanctions for Collins himself, government officials in London said the review was still continuing. Representatives for the judge did not respond to requests for comment. - 'Clumsy threat' - David Anderson, a senior British barrister at a rival firm, described Essex Court Chambers staff as "some of the most distinguished international lawyers in the world". "Its members are all self-employed independent barristers, who will not be intimidated into silence by clumsy threats of this kind," he told AFP. "By severing contact with some of the world's top experts in international law, the Chinese regime condemns itself." Julian Ku, an international law expert at New York's Hofstra University, said Beijing may not have realised how precedent-setting the inclusion of an entire international legal operation could be. "I get the feeling the UK sanctions were drawn up in haste and without much careful consideration in China, which might explain why Essex Court Chambers as a whole was sanctioned," he told AFP. Hong Kong and Beijing have dismissed concerns about the city's legal hub status. But doubts are becoming more vocal, especially after Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law that grants the mainland jurisdiction in some cases. Chinese leaders have made clear they expect all those involved in running Hong Kong -- including judges -- to be "staunch patriots". And the Hong Kong Bar Association has been repeatedly slammed by Chinese state media for voicing concerns over the rule of law. Schona Jolly, chair of the UK's Bar Human Rights Committee, called the targeting of Essex Court Chambers "maladroit and self-defeating". "Such a misstep only sharpens the attention of the world on the plight of those in Xinjiang, and heightens the perception that the commitment of the Chinese state to the rule of law, including in Hong Kong, is unstable and hollow," she told AFP. bur-jit/phz/jz
Biden's trade representative talks China with Japanese officials Washington (AFP) March 23, 2021 US Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Tuesday discussed China's trade practices in calls with Japanese ministers, as President Joe Biden weighs how to handle trade relations with Beijing. Tai, who was confirmed as Biden's trade negotiator last week, "shared concerns about unfair trading practices from non-market economies, such as China," according to readouts of the calls with Japan's Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Kajiyama Hiroshi and Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu. The United Sta ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |