|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
|
![]() |
![]() by Staff Writers Beijing (AFP) Aug 17, 2015
Chinese state-run media on Monday lambasted officials in the port city of Tianjin for a lack of transparency over the massive explosions at an industrial site that killed 112 and devastated a vast area. The editorials and commentary pieces echoed frustrations voiced by Tianjin residents, victims' relatives and netizens over the slow release of information in the aftermath of the August 12 explosions. Chinese authorities have moved to limit criticism of the handling of the blasts by suspending or shutting down dozens of websites and hundreds of social media accounts. Mainstream media -- which in China are effectively controlled by the authorities -- condemned local officials' lack of transparency, saying it could reflect badly on the government. "During the first dozens of hours after the blasts, there was scant information offered by Tianjin authorities," the Global Times tabloid said in an editorial. "Tianjin is not an exceptional case in terms of the inadequate disaster-response work," the paper, which has close ties to the ruling Communist Party, wrote. "Making some efforts to respond to reporters should become routine if local governments encounter a major event in future. "A single slow reaction can lead to rumours running riot. And in turn, public confidence in the government will continue to fall." The government-published China Daily, meanwhile, noted that "many questions... remain to be answered" over the blasts, which triggered a days-long fire and fears over potential toxic contamination from pollutants being stored at the blast site. "Not surprisingly, the lack of verified information has resulted in conspiracy theories emerging," it wrote. "These conspiracy theories will build up a head of steam unless the government unravels the mysteries surrounding the incident with a thorough and transparent probe that is able to answer people's questions." Another commentary published in the China Discipline Inspection and Supervision News, a paper affiliated to the Communist Party's top anti-corruption watchdog, said industrial disasters such as Tianjin exposed serious loopholes in implementation of the country's regulations. "The sputtering flames engulfed not only lives and property, but also the sense of security," the commentary said. "The property developer of the compounds and the residents did not know they were living beside a 'volcano' until the explosions took place." But not all papers were so critical. The People's Daily, the Communist Party's official mouthpiece, said critics "should know that doubts and concerns were baseless and unnecessary". "Public opinion should also understand the government's cautiousness and earnestness," it wrote. "Questioning and denying are not a rational attitude."
Related Links Bringing Order To A World Of Disasters A world of storm and tempest When the Earth Quakes
|
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |