. | . |
Financial crisis darkens outlook for climate talks Paris (AFP) Oct 5, 2008 Wall Street's sickness and its contagiousness for the world economy are bad news for the already faltering effort to craft a new pact to tackle climate change. Tighter budgets, shrinking corporate profits and worries about jobs could crimp manoeuvering room at upcoming UN talks on toughening curbs on greenhouse-gas emissions, sources say. But -- so far, at least -- the crisis does not appear to be having an impact on investment in clean technology, say these sources. Indeed, some are confident that spending on wind, solar and other renewables may even rise. Running in Poznan, Poland, from December 1-12, the talks are a stepping stone towards a treaty to brake emissions from fossil fuels beyond 2012 and support developing countries in climate change's firing line. But curbing pollution and stumping up money for the poor entails economic sacrifice. And the financial hurricane that swept through New York last month and now buffets the real economy could sap some of the will to make it. "When growth is strong, it's easier to handle differences [at the negotiating table] than when growth is weak," said Jean-Charles Hourcade, director of a French think thank, the International Centre for Research on the Environment and Development (Cired). Steve Sawyer, secretary general of a Brussels-based industry group, the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), predicted some governments might invoke the crisis to tiptoe away from their commitments. "Some politicians will try to use the current crisis and seemingly inevitable slowdown to draw attention away from their failure to act on future and current commitments," he said. "But regardless of what politicians believe at any given moment, global warming is in fact a challenge that cannot be ducked." Officially, at least, the European Union (EU) -- the most ambitious of the economic powers on climate change -- says it will not weaken on its pledges. The EU intends to cut its emissions by 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, and to deepen this to 30 percent if the United States or other big economy follows suit. "There is an economic crisis, a financial crisis, an energy crisis and there is a climate crisis," EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said last Wednesday. "The climate crisis is permanent. All the other crises today, tomorrow, I hope will pass but the climate crisis is a permanent threat for the globe." With President George W. Bush's authority seeping away ahead of his departure from office, eyes in Poznan will be on an expected "shadow" US delegation, named by the winner of the November election to the White House. Both Barack Obama and John McCain have called climate change a priority. Both favour cutting US emissions by 2020 and deepening them by 2050, and want a cap-and-trade system to achieve this, something which Bush has bitterly opposed. Sawyer said that guiding an emissions bill through Congress will be "a long, protracted battle." "For the moment, everything is taking a back burner to the credit crisis, which could slow down an already difficult process," he said. Thirty years ago, a turndown in the world economy drove down the price of oil, sandbagging early hopes for renewable energy, whose fortunes had risen during the second energy shock of the late 1970s. Several experts questioned by AFP were confident renewables would not repeat this rise and fall. Renewables have already got a foothold, which may slip a little in the short term but would endure in the long term, they argued. Demand by Asia's emerging giants and more limited oil supplies would keep oil prices relatively high, thus maintaining an incentive for cleaner sources. In addition, Europe and the United States were now keen on renewables, which are home-procured, for easing their energy dependence on the Middle East and Russia. New, cleaner technologies are therefore a good investment, easing geopolitical worries, creating jobs and reducing carbon emissions, according to this argument. "There is a risk that we might lose a few years. Lots of people think only in the short term," said Oliver Schaefer of the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC). "But I am hopeful, because we have illustrations to show that investing in the environment is now an opportunity rather than a cost. That wasn't the case 10 years ago." Brice Lalonde, France's ambassador at the climate talks, said the financial crisis "may have an impact on available finance" but also opened the way to an era of smarter economic growth. "It may have a positive impact, in the sense that, to get out of the crisis, we invest in the fight against climate change, because it leads to a new form of development, a new demand for new technologies, a new generation of towns, cars, and so on."
earlier related report Members of the European parliament's environmental committee are preparing for a "Super Tuesday" with their votes on key issues of the proposals set to form the basis for the position of the chamber as a whole. The parliament and the 27 EU member states must approve the ambitious environmental measures in order to finalise the plan by the end of the year. The European Union deal will then be able to bed down a common position for key international climate change talks in Copenhagen at the end of next year. In January, the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, proposed a series of measures with the overall aim of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020. Among the initiatives were bringing the level of renewable energy up to 20 percent of total consumption, setting strict rules on car emissions and boosting the use of biofuels. The environmental group WWF charged Friday that Europe's plan of action to tackle climate change was being undermined by pressure from industry and may no longer achieve its original green goals. The results of Tuesday's deliberations in the European parliament remain far from sure, with conservatives and socialists divided in the image of the countries they represent. The WWF in particular criticised the "manoeuvres" of German members of the European Parliament to "delay everything". Germany, Europe's biggest car producer and producer of Europe's biggest cars, feels the plan to oblige all car makers to reach the same average emissions target is punitive to the likes of BMW and Mercedes. With Germany entering into an electoral period, and with its leaders very receptive to the concerns of the captains of industry, the pressure is there. Tuesday's votes concern three main planks of the overall EU plan; how to run the system for allocating and exchange greenhouse gas emission quotas, efforts in each member state in the non-industrial area and, thirdly, ways of developing the capture and storage of carbon dioxide. One of the key proposals is the auctioning from 2013 of carbon dioxide emissions permits, currently handed out free to heavy industry. This would bring an estimated 44 billion euros (61 billion dollars) per year into European coffers. However European captains of industry fears the measures will hit them and help their overseas competitors. They won a first victory when the EU parliament's industry committee recently introduced a series of amendments in favour of allocating a sizeable proportion of the emissions allowances for free and rejecting penalties for countries failing to reach their national emissions targets. Last Thursday metallurgy sector union leaders called the EU Commission's CO2 reduction targets "impossible to achieve", urging the European parliament to "improve" the exchange system. Compromise discussions between EU member states have also been seeking to make some of the proposed rules more lenient. The WWF and Greenpeace accuse the current French EU presidency of bowing to industry pressure. The compromise with industry, particularly German interests, is "undermining everything (and) really goes in the wrong direction," Daria Villagrasa, from WWF's energy programme, told a press conference in Brussels on Friday. The ecologists are especially concerned that the global financial crisis is also hampering their cause, with company directors more worried about saving their businesses than the planet. Or as German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier put it: "It is clear that the failure of a bank preoccupies opinion more today than global warming." Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
Land Use In The Light Of Climate Change Bonn, Germany (SPX) Oct 03, 2008 The future use of land space worldwide and of natural resources in the light of climate change is the topic of a high level German-American scientific conference organised by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), taking place in Berlin this week. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |