. Earth Science News .
WHALES AHOY
'Jury out' on controversial whaling deal

Japan says it would ignore bluefin tuna ban
Tokyo (AFP) March 4, 2010 - Japan said on Thursday it would ignore any ban on international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna, a proposal that has won US support ahead of a crucial vote next month. The ban, meant to save the species from extinction, has the support of many European nations but is opposed by Japan, which consumes three quarters of the global catch of bluefin tuna, a species much valued in sushi and sashimi. "The situation is becoming more difficult for Japan," said the vice fisheries minister Masahiko Yamada, ahead of a March 13-25 meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). "Japan will inevitably have to take a reservation" if the body votes for a trade ban at the meeting in the Qatari capital Doha, he said. Member countries which take a "reservation" would effectively be able to keep trading with other nations that also opt out of the ban.

Tokyo says it prefers other ways to make the catch more sustainable. In November, Japan said it supported a 40 percent quota cut agreed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The body agreed to slash the total catch in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean from 22,000 tons in 2009 to 13,500 tons this year. Environmentalists say industrial fleets routinely exceed such limits. Monaco has spearheaded the drive for a ban, which enjoys strong support from Britain and Germany, but is opposed by Spain, Greece and Malta, which all have significant tuna industries.

France, the biggest producer of bluefin tuna for consumption, has spoken in favour of a ban, but for a limited duration and not for another 18 months. Other countries believed to be opposed to a ban include Canada and China. A ban on the tuna trade would require support by two-thirds of the roughly 175 nations that make up CITES. Bluefin stocks in the Western Atlantic have fallen by more than 80 percent from 1970 to 2007. A 232.6-kilogram (512-pound) bluefin fetched a near-record 16.28 million yen (176,000 dollars) this year at Tokyo's famous Tsukiji fish market.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) March 4, 2010
Australia and Japan have failed to reach a breakthrough in an intensifying row on whaling, but delegates in three days of intense talks say that all sides agreed to keep seeking common ground.

Some 25 nations met through Thursday at a Florida beach resort to consider a compromise to let Japan, Norway and Iceland hunt the ocean giants openly despite a 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling.

In return, whaling nations would agree to reduce their catch "significantly" over a 10-year period and put their activities under the close supervision of the 88-nation International Whaling Commission (IWC).

Asked if supporters and opponents of whaling could eventually strike a deal, Monica Medina, the US commissioner to the IWC, said: "I think the jury is out."

Australia and Japan "are emphasizing that their governments work together on many issues, but neither side has signaled that they are ready to completely meet the other one all the way," Medina told AFP.

Whaling commission leaders will use the Florida talks to flesh out the proposal and submit it to negotiators by April 22, giving nations time to review it before the next full IWC meeting the following month in Morocco.

Anthony Liverpool, the vice chair of the IWC, said he was hopeful after the talks near Saint Petersburg, Florida.

"All of the governments indicated a desire to move forward and I believe that is commendable and extremely important to the future of the IWC," he said in a statement.

Phil Kline of Greenpeace, which strongly opposes the compromise, said of the talks: "There are clear divisions, but they are willing to talk about it some more."

Japan, which says that whaling is part of its culture, kills hundreds of the marine mammals each year in the Antarctic Ocean, revolting Australia and New Zealand where whale-watching is a popular pastime.

Japan uses a loophole in the 1986 moratorium that allows "lethal research" on whales, with the meat winding up on dinner plates. Norway and Iceland defy the moratorium altogether by lodging objections with the IWC.

Medina said that the United States has not yet taken a position on the proposal as it is waiting for exact figures on the number of whales that would be hunted.

But she indicated that the United States -- one of the closest allies of both Australia and Japan -- was supportive of a compromise if it reduced the number of whales killed.

"The whales don't know the word moratorium," Medina said.

She said it was important to "look at the number of whales in the water that can be conserved under an agreement like this one."

"We don't have numbers and so I can't say that it would have achieved that yet," she said. "This isn't anything that the US could support at this point in time."

"It is a difficult decision and the US government would never take a position that would support commercial whaling or endorse it. But on the other hand, right now we have no way to stop it."

Several lawmakers from President Barack Obama's Democratic Party have already voiced opposition to the compromise.

Madeleine Bordallo, who heads the House subcommittee handling oceans policy, said she had "grave doubts" that negotiations would lead to fewer whales being killed.

"I cannot foresee any agreement that would be sufficiently airtight to merit overturning the 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling," Bordallo said.

Medina said that approval of the package in Morocco would need a vote by three-quarters of countries, casting doubt on the goal of reaching a consensus.

Australia had said before the talks that the IWC proposal was unacceptable as it did not stop Japanese whaling in the Antarctic. But participants said Australia faced pressure in the Florida talks to find a way to compromise.

"Conservation countries have moved far in offering a compromise but there has not been one single concession from the whalers," said Nicolas Entrup of the Munich-based Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society.

"What this amounts to is legitimizing commercial whaling," he said. "It is a moratorium on the moratorium."



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Follow the Whaling Debate



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


WHALES AHOY
Plea for whaling compromise as rivals meet
Washington (AFP) March 3, 2010
A former prime minister of New Zealand pleaded with supporters and opponents of whaling to "swallow a dead rat" and accept a controversial compromise when negotiators wrap up talks Thursday in Florida. Key nations including Australia and Japan, whose relations have been increasingly strained over whaling, have been meeting since Tuesday away from the cameras at a beachside hotel near Saint P ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement