. Earth Science News .
Nobel pair highlight free-market 'failures'

US economics laureate highlights efforts at conservation
Nobel economics co-laureate Elinor Ostrom said Monday her recognition highlights the need for more citizen involvement in efforts to protect natural resources. Ostrom, the first woman to win a Nobel prize in economics, shared the award with US economist Oliver Williamson of the University of California-Berkeley. The professor of political science and co-director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University said her work is focused on ways in which communities around the world can manage resources needed for their survival. "I have been studying how local people as well as government officials have attempted to solve very difficult problems," such as deforestation and loss of fisheries, she told a news conference. "When individuals have this way of working together officially and can build trust and respect they may be able to solve problems. "Because a public official has a PhD doesn't necessarily mean they know more than people who have been living with a resource... there is a lot of indigenous knowledge we have to respect." Her comments at the university did not address issues on the current economic crisis. Her work challenged the notion that common property is poorly managed and should be either regulated by central authorities or privatized, the Nobel jury said. "If we want to halt the degradation of our natural environment and prevent a repetition of the many collapses of natural-resource stocks experienced in the past, we should learn from the successes and failures of common-property regimes," it said. She conducted numerous studies of user-managed fish stocks, pastures, woods, lakes and groundwater basins, and concluded that the outcomes are "more often than not, better than predicted by standard theories," it added. Ostrom said it was "a great thrill and a very big surprise," to win the Nobel. Asked about being the first woman economics laureate, she said: "I think we've already entered a new era and we recognize that women have the capability of doing great scientific work. I think it's an honor to be the first woman but I won't be the last."
by Staff Writers
Paris (AFP) Oct 12, 2009
The quest for economic harmony when pure free market principles break down makes Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson timely choices for this year's Nobel Economics Prize, experts sid.

"Both the Nobel laureates this year have been working on areas that kicked off with the concept of failing markets," said Landis Gabel, a professor at French business school INSEAD, who studied under Williamson in the 1970s.

The choice of Williamson and Ostrom was "timely" in the light of last year's financial collapse, he told AFP. Some traditional market theorists' ideas are considered discredited by the recent financial and economic turmoil.

Gabel said that "both of these laureates have done work quite different from the more traditional, purely theoretical work" based on concepts of "perfect markets."

In Ostrom's area of expertise, he said, "the (market) failure has to do with common resources," while in Williamson's it concerns "imperfections that have implications for the structure of business firms."

Klaus Zauner, an economics professor at City University in London, said Williamson was long overdue a Nobel prize for having "revolutionised" economics through his "transaction cost" theory, now widely taught in business schools.

It enabled businesses to put a price on the savings they can make from long-term economic partnerships as opposed to spot market transactions -- even when at first glance the market-driven option appeared less costly.

Williamson's ideas "have changed the way financial firms are run," said Timothy van Zandt, another INSEAD economics professor.

Ostrom meanwhile has shown how people, rather than market forces, can be the best solution to disputes over shared resources.

"She was the first to emphasise the management of common resources, which do not belong to anybody and must be managed collectively," said Martine Antona, an economist at the French agronomical institute Cirad.

These ideas "began to gain international weight when people started to say that carbon and biodiversity are common goods," she said.

Ostrom is a political scientist little known among economists, and the first woman ever to win the prize. With its bearing on the environment and politics, her work signals "a merging of the social sciences," Zauner said.

Where shared resources -- such as the world's over-exploited stocks of tuna -- are concerned, "if each economic agent looks at their own self-interest then they would over-use the resource," he said.

The answer is cooperation -- rather than competition -- by the groups of people involved.

"Ostrom shows that in some cases an informal relationship that does not incorporate in the market place can actually lead to better solutions for everybody," Zauner said.

Van Zandt told AFP that Ostrom's award "fits in very well" with current global environmental concerns.

These include "how to deal with over-exploited fisheries, global warming and other environmental problems which ultimately come down to too many people using too much of the resources," he said.

Her work, which has included observing poor rural societies, examines the kinds of sustained relationships that bring long-term benefits rather than quick profit, comparable to the business ties covered by Williamson.

Such "informal" links "resolve market failures better than economists would have predicted, without necessarily explicit government intervention," Van Zandt said.

During the financial crisis and subsequent economic hardship of the past two years, many observers likewise saw a crisis of faith in free markets where players make rational economic decisions driven by supply and demand.

Monday's Nobel award "might be a reaction to the problems that have surfaced principally in financial economics," Gabel said.

"That's the field that made the strongest assumptions of perfect rational behaviour, perfect markets. There's a reaction against that now."

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Economy



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Japan PM says too early to wind down regional stimulus
Beijing (AFP) Oct 10, 2009
Japan's prime minister said Saturday he had agreed with leaders of China and South Korea that it was too early to wind back stimulus policies designed to help their countries weather the economic crisis. Speaking at a joint press conference after a three-way summit in Beijing, Yukio Hatoyama said he and his two counterparts had agreed it was "premature to take an exit strategy" and withdraw ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement