. | . |
Public Ho-Hum Over Threat From Yearly Cull From Deadly Flu
UPI Correspondent West Palm Beach FL (UPI) Feb 26, 2007 While the world focuses on scares of possible pandemic bird flu, the annual seasonal influenza continues to take a worrisome toll on the very young, the elderly and the frail. But, unless the illness is caused by a bird or rages into a pandemic, influenza is greeted with a shrug. "There is so much talk of bird flu and fear of the pandemic, but every year we are subject to the serious threat of an outbreak of influenza which can result in severe illness and loss of life," said John Oxford, professor of virology at St. Bartholomew's and the Royal London Hospital in the United Kingdom. Worldwide, seasonal influenza affects 500 million people and claims half a million lives each year, Oxford told United Press International. Regardless of the type of influenza strain that is most dominant each year, influenza's annual impact on society and the economy accounts for one in 10 of all absences from the workplace and costs $12 billion in lost productivity annually in the United States alone, he said. A survey released Thursday at a Brussels fair aimed at increasing awareness of influenza illustrates the problem. Researchers interviewed 132 doctors in the United States and Europe on why they tended to limit prescribing medications for treatment of influenza. + About 23 percent of the physicians said their perception was that influenza was a self-limiting disease. + About 33 percent of doctors suggested that over-the-counter symptomatic remedies were sufficient to control the disease. + About 46 percent of doctors said their patients simply do not seek help in time to benefit from medical treatment for influenza. "People can be complacent about seasonal influenza, but there is much that can be done," said Ab Osterhaus, professor of virology at Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. "Current tools, such as vaccines and anti-virals, are still under-used despite being both medically and economically justified. It's important for people to take seasonal influenza seriously and to take precautions to prevent and treat it whilst minimizing its spread." H5N1 influenza, the much talked about "bird flu," is one particular strain of the influenza virus and is only transmitted to humans through close contact with infected birds. As of Feb. 16, 273 people have been infected with the virus, and 167 have died. Experts believe the next influenza pandemic is inevitable and possibly imminent, and preparations are under way to try and minimize its impact. Influenza, commonly called "flu," is an acute respiratory illness that affects the upper and/or lower parts of the respiratory tract and is caused by an influenza virus. Flu is highly contagious and spreads rapidly by coughs and sneezes from people who are already carrying the virus. Patients become ill between 18 and 72 hours after being infected. The most common symptoms of uncomplicated influenza are an abrupt onset of fever, shivering, headache, muscle ache and a dry cough. "It's crucial that people take seasonal influenza more seriously than they currently do," Oxford told UPI. "Just because it raises its ugly head each year does not mean we should overlook it -- quite the contrary. We should learn year by year and build up our resources and experience to get rid of it once and for all or at least beat it into swift retreat. "Doctors and the public alike tend to sit back and let flu run its course, but preventing it and treating it can make a huge difference to minimizing its impact and ultimately curbing its spread." He said that the elderly and the very young, and those with chronic medical conditions or weakened immune systems, are most at risk. "Seasonal influenza spreads simply because people get the flu and then pass it on to others," Oxford said. "We all should act responsibly to prevent ourselves and our families getting the flu and, if we do get it, to avoid contributing to its spread by passing it on to others, including those most at risk."
earlier related report In an international study, 153 cases of influenza occurred among children who received the nasally inhaled, live, attenuated vaccine FluMist (MedImmune), while 338 flu cases were recorded among children who were injected with an inactivated flu vaccine, researchers reported Wednesday. The report will be published in Thursday's editions of the New England Journal of Medicine. "There were 54.9 percent fewer cases of cultured-confirmed influenza in the group that received live attenuated vaccine than in the group that received inactivated vaccine," said Robert Belshe, professor and director of the division of infectious disease and immunology at Saint Louis University. However, the higher rate of success in preventing children from contracting the flu does come with some complications. Belshe noted that higher rates of wheezing were seen among patients who were given the live vaccine, especially in children with a history of wheezing and in children who were under a year of age. In the children ages 6 months to 11 months, about 3.8 percent of those getting the live vaccine developed wheezing compared with 2.1 percent of the children who got the inactivated influenza virus, he said. Although those numbers of children were small, the difference was statistically significant. "Vaccines should have minimal side effects because they are being given to people who are not sick," said Carolyn Bridges, associate director of science in the influenza division of National Centers for Immunology and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. "The Food and Drug Administration with have to weigh the success of the live vaccine in protecting against the flu against the side effects associated with it before deciding whether to license the vaccine for children from 6 months to 59 months of age," Bridges told United Press International. Current guidelines call for vaccination of children ages 6 month to 59 months, plus individuals at high risk of infection with influenza -- generally the elderly and those with weakened immune systems. "We also believe that if you live in a household where there is a person who is at high risk of influenza, all members of the household should be vaccinated," said Bridges, co-author of an editorial in the journal that accompanies Belshe's report. She said that was especially true for households where there are babies under the age of 6 months. "We do not vaccinate children under 6 months of age against influenza," she explained. But if all the members of the household are vaccinated, the infant would receive "herd" protection against the disease, she said. In the study, Belshe and colleague enrolled 4,179 children to receive the live vaccine and 4,173 children to receive the inactivated vaccine. Children in North America who received inactivated vaccine were given Fluzone (Aventis Pasteur); children who were assigned to receive inactivated vaccine who lived in Europe and the Middle East, were inoculated with Vaxigrip (Aventis Pasteur). Children were observed to determine how well the vaccine protected them against influenza and also how often adverse side effects occurred. Children who had a history of wheezing or asthma-like diseases appear to be at greater risk of wheezing within 42 days of inhaling the live vaccine. Infants under the age of one years were more likely to need hospitalization within 180 days of received the live vaccine that were children of the same age who received the inactive product, Belshe said. "The live attenuated influenza vaccine we used has many of the characteristics that are desirable for the control of epidemic influenza," Belshe said. However, he suggested that until scientists could determine why the incidence of wheezing was higher in children with a history of wheezing and why serious adverse events occurred more often in younger children, caution should be used in delivering the vaccine to that group. "At this point in time," Bridges told UPI, "there is not likely to be any change in practice regarding who gets the vaccine because the live vaccine is not yet approved for children 6 months to 5 years of age." If that approval occurs, then doctors and parents of children will have to weigh the risks and benefits of treatment with either of the vaccines. She noted that even though the live vaccine reduced the risk of contracting influenza, neither vaccine was 100 percent protective.
Source: United Press International Related Links The science and news of Epidemics on Earth SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express |
|
The contents herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2005 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy statement |