. | . |
Rio trial spotlights risky China business world
Sydney (AFP) March 31, 2010 The high-profile Rio Tinto trial has lifted the lid on the opaque, and often risky, process of doing business in China -- and become an object lesson for other foreign companies, analysts say. The heavy sentences for bribery and industrial espionage serve as a warning for firms wading into treacherous waters in the emerging giant, where "guanxi" (connections) are vital, sharp practice is common and laws ill-defined. "It's extremely rare to not engage in some level of activity which is slightly dubious," said John Lee, a fellow of the Centre for Independent Studies think-tank. Australian citizen Stern Hu and three Chinese colleagues were jailed for between seven and 14 years on Monday after a three-day trial in Shanghai, much of it held behind closed doors. They were arrested last July during failed talks to set annual prices for iron ore, a core ingredient of the steel that is building the country's industrial revolution. While only limited details of their crimes are known, media reports have revealed an environment where deals are smoothed with gifts and unscrupulous traders overcharge steel mills for ore, sharing the spoils with insiders. "It shows the difficulty of knowing what limitations there are on your actions in order to find out what information you might need," said David Martin Jones, an Asia expert from Australia's Queensland University. In China's business culture, that "might entail a bit of taking people out for lunch and slipping a few brown paper envelopes under the table". And as Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith has made clear, the lack of transparency in the Rio trial also leaves foreign companies unsure on where China draws the line on what constitutes trade secrets. According to Martin Jones, the case of Hu, a father-of-two who was born and educated in China, will serve as a "cautionary tale" for businesses hoping to take advantage of the country's economic rise. "I think (other companies) will be very careful about the advice they're giving to people who are negotiating for them in China and get them to play it strictly by the rules," he said. "The rules of the game don't seem to apply in an Anglo, Australian or American economic framework. On the other hand there's big money to be made so it's kind of a cost-benefit analysis." Experts say similar calculations are being made in boardrooms of Western companies which will now take a closer look at their operations in China. "The dilemma is you need cooperation and support from local (communist) party officials to do business, because local officials tend to have a lot of control," said Lee. "On the other hand, as the Stern Hu case shows, if you fall foul of these officials they can use the law to prosecute you for corrupt activities and that just increases the personal and legal risk for companies. "Unfortunately there's just no way of getting round that because that's the way that business is done." China's rampant growth is now propping up the flagging world economy, accelerating the collision course between its institutions and Western standards for business and justice. The timing of the arrests -- as the iron ore contract talks collapsed, and just weeks after Rio snubbed a major Chinese investment -- caused concern, as well as the brief, part-closed trial. "The Chinese authorities might have known he (Stern Hu) was acting close to the line and they were prepared to let it go as long as there was a deal with Rio Tinto on the table," said Martin Jones. "As soon as that collapsed they decided to enforce the rules very rigidly." Deakin University analyst Damien Kingsbury said Rio, which signed a 1.4 billion US dollar deal with China just days before the trial, seemed to have struck a pact with Chinese authorities. Ahead of the verdict, Rio said it respected China's judicial process. Afterwards, it disowned the four convicted employees. "What that tells you is that individuals don't count for much at that level of business, but also that probably a deal has been done," Kingsbury said. He said there was only one way to avoid trouble in a country where some 45 million local, and often unaccountable, party officials control the operating environment. "Make sure you're squeaky clean ... and try not to annoy the government too much."
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Global Trade News
China rejects Australia trial complaints Beijing (AFP) March 30, 2010 China took aim at Australia Tuesday over its criticism of the handling of the corruption trial of four employees of mining giant Rio Tinto, ratcheting up tensions between the two key trading partners. "We express serious concern over the Australian remarks," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang told reporters. "The Australian side should respect that result and stop making such irresp ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |