. Earth Science News .
World leaders defend climate deal

British minister blames China for opposing Copenhagen deal
London (AFP) Dec 20, 2009 - Britain's climate change minister Ed Miliband Sunday blamed China for blocking an accord on legally-binding emissions targets and a 50 percent cut in greenhouse gases by 2050 at the Copenhagen summit. Miliband admitted the results of the Copenhagen conference were "disappointing" but insisted that important progress was made in the fight against global warming. "We got a lot of commitments, not just from developed countries, but developing countries like China and India as well," he told Sky News. "The eventual outcome was disappointing. The most important reason actually is not so much to do with the commitments -- because there are actually quite important and good commitments on emissions and finances -- but on the issue of it becoming legally binding." Efforts to give legal backing to the commitments in the Copenhagen accord met with "impossible resistance from a small number of developing countries, including China, who didn't want a legal agreement," he said.

"If leading countries hold out against something like 'legally binding' or against the 2050 target of 50 percent reductions in carbon emissions -- which was held out against by countries like China -- you are not going to get the agreement you want." When asked about accusations that the watered-down agreement reached at the UN conference failed to protect poor people in developing countries, Miliband said: "The alternatives were no agreement or the agreement we have. "The fact is that we have got fast-start finance of 10 billion dollars a year flowing as a result of this agreement. "We have got important cuts for rich and developing countries in their emissions. We won't know the precise shape of them until the beginning of February and we are going to have to push for them to be higher. "But the idea that walking away from agreement would have been better for people facing climate change is frankly ridiculous." He added: "Even though there were things we didn't achieve, the fact is we have got for the first time developing countries coming together and saying that they are going to reduce emissions and the finance is flowing."
by Staff Writers
Copenhagen (AFP) Dec 20, 2009
World leaders defended Sunday the much-criticised climate deal they struck at a UN summit as a key step in the fight against global warming despite its lack of targets to curb emissions.

Newspapers widely branded the accord a failure and experts such as the head of a Nobel Peace prize-winning climate panel said "urgent" action was now needed.

US President Barack Obama acknowledged that all of the world's polluters would quickly have to do more, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the critics would only hold up the battle against rising temperatures that threaten devastating floods, storms and drought.

Obama returned to the White House and said "extremely difficult and complex negotiations" had been needed in Copenhagen.

"This breakthrough lays the foundation for international action in the years to come."

But even the US leader said "we will have to build on the momentum" and get the US Congress to pass mandatory cuts in greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

Merkel hit back at critics saying Copenhagen was "a first step toward a new world climate order, nothing more but also nothing less," she told Bild am Sonntag newspaper.

"Those who are only putting Copenhagen down are helping those who want to blockade rather than move forward."

Germany will host a follow-up meeting of environment ministers in Bonn in June, ahead of another summit in Mexico City next December.

The Danish chair of the UN climate summit, Connie Hedegaard, said Sunday she thought it would be difficult to gather together so many world leaders again for a new conference, though the effort must be made.

The Copenhagen Accord, only passed by a procedural motion after two weeks of tense negotiations, has been widely condemned as a backdoor deal that excludes the poor and dooms the world to disastrous climate change.

The agreement was assembled by the leaders of the United States, China, India, Brazil, South Africa and major European nations, after it became clear the 194-nation summit was in danger of failure.

Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen said the agreement reached in Copenhagen was "better than nothing" and "not a bad result."

China, the world's top polluter, has given the warmest welcome to a summit that experts say it has benefited from by making the fewest concessions.

"With the efforts of all parties, the summit yielded significant and positive results," Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi said in a statement.

The summit set a commitment to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit), but did not spell out the important global emissions targets for 2020 or 2050 that are the key to holding down temperatures.

It also promised 100 billion dollars for poor nations that risk bearing the brunt of the global warming fallout, but has not given a fixed payout plan.

So far, the United States has promised to contribute 3.6 billion dollars in climate funds for the 2010-2012 period, with Japan contributing a total of 11 billion dollars, and the European Union 10.6 billion dollars.

However, the Council of Europe criticised the Copenhagen accord as a "missed opportunity" for failing to take "concrete decisions", which threatens food security and access to water or land for people who could "swell the ranks of climate refugees," said Lluis Maria de Puig, head of the Council's parliamentary assembly.

Even UN chief General Ban Ki-moon admitted the agreement had failed to win global consensus and would disappoint many who demanded stronger action against climate change.

"Many will say that it lacks ambition," Ban told the end of the summit. "Nonetheless, you have achieved much."

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said: "Developing countries, certainly Africa, are very concerned and very suspicious of the developed countries on whether they are really genuine in making these offers."

New research published Sunday suggested that carbon dioxide may be having more of an effect on global temperatures than previously thought.

The study, focussing on a period three to five million years ago, said that calculations for man-made global warming may be underestimated by between 30 and 50 percent.

"Since there is no indication that the future will behave differently than the past, we should expect a couple of degrees of continued warming even if we held CO2 concentrations at the current level," said the paper's lead author, Mark Pagani.

earlier related report
China 'positive' on Copenhagen summit
Beijing (AFP) Dec 20, 2009 - China on Sunday welcomed the outcome of climate change talks in Copenhagen, the day after a deal reached to fight global warming came in for heavy criticism.

"With the efforts of all parties, the summit yielded significant and positive results," foreign minister Yang Jiechi was quoted as saying in a statement on the foreign ministry website.

The Copenhagen Accord, passed Saturday after two weeks of frantic negotiations, was strongly condemned as a backdoor deal that violated UN democracy, excluded the poor and doomed the world to disastrous climate change.

The agreement was assembled at the last minute by a small group consisting of leaders of the United States, China, India, Brazil, South Africa and major European nations, after it became clear the summit was in danger of failure.

It set a commitment to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit), but did not spell out the important stepping stones -- global emissions targets for 2020 or 2050 -- for getting there.

Nor did it identify a year by which emissions should peak, and pledges were made voluntary and free from tough compliance provisions.

Yang, who never specifically mentioned the accord, said the summit had successfully maintained the principle of "common but differentiated responsibility," which recognises differing economic circumstances between emerging and rich nations.

China, the world's biggest carbon polluter, has always said rich countries should take the lead in committing to substantial emission reduction targets and provide finance to developing countries battling climate change.

The Copenhagen Accord set a goal of "jointly mobilising" 100 billion dollars for developing nations by 2020.

Yang added that the summit made a step forward with regards to developed countries' mandatory emissions cuts and developing nations' voluntary mitigation actions.

"Third, it reached broad consensus on the key issues of long-term global targets, funding, technology support (to developing countries), and transparency," Yang said, according to the statement.

China has pledged to reduce carbon emissions per unit of gross domestic product by 40 to 45 percent by 2020 based on 2005 levels.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


China becomes quiet climate kingmaker
Copenhagen (AFP) Dec 20, 2009
China's complicated relationship with the West is casting a cloud over global talks on climate change, contributing to the tepid outcome of the high-stakes Copenhagen summit, observers say. China, the top emitter of greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, played its cards close to its chest at the 12-day summit with Premier Wen Jiabao moving little beyond previous statements. But China ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement